Current Editorials: Bush Declares War on Gays

From Morons Dot Org:

First Afghanistan, then Iraq, and now law-abiding, tax-paying American citizens who happen to be sexually attracted to members of the same sex…

President Bush is declaring war on a new front and showing us just how out of touch he and his party are with the majority of Americans. He recently told Diane Sawyer, “If necessary, I will support a constitutional amendment which would honor marriage between a man and a woman, codify that.” He said that what would make it “necessary” would be if “judicial rulings undermine the sanctity of marriage” but stopped short of mentioning that judges wear black robes, but he did claim that the Massachusetts ruling was “judicial activism” which is neocon-correctness code for “ruled in a way we didn’t like”. This assertion also flies in the face of the facts: this was not an “activist” court by any stretch of the imagination.

This stance ironically puts Bush in a minority of similar size to the minority he’s attacking. A recent Pew Forum poll showed that only 10% of Americans would go so far as to amend the US Constitution to ensure that gays can never marry or achive rights similar to those granted by marriage in any state. Forty-two percent feel that existing legislation is adequate. A slim majority of 59% opposes gay marriage altogether. Another interesting aspect of the poll was that dumber Americans were twice as likely to oppose gay unions than more educated citizens.

In any case, at least it’s now obvious where Bush stands on the issue, even though he continues to try to sugar coat his position, claiming he espouses “tolerance” when he says, “I do believe in the sanctity of marriage. But I don’t see that as conflict with being a tolerant person or an understanding person.” He’s tolerant of the gays just so long as they can’t have the same rights as everybody else, of course.

Bush also can’t decide whether he supports states’ rights or whether he’s a federalist. He says it’s his administration’s position that “whatever legal arrangements people want to make, they’re allowed to make, so long as it’s embraced by the state” however he supports forcing all states to comply with an outright ban on marriage “or incidents thereof”… presumably this would mean that citizens in those states would not be allowed to make those arrangements, regardless of if the state embraced them.

So once again, Bush is a hypocrite and a liar and declaring war on a minority of people to appease his buddies in the religious right. Please try to keep your shock and awe under control.

Aaronsw: I'm Not President But I Play One On TV

Aaron posted a great entry about Dean.

After watching him for a few days, I think Dean is the real deal. And his campaign manager, Joe Trippi, is doing everything right. Dean’s raising money from the grassroots, not the Democratic party elites. He’s got a comprehensive campaign finance reform plan. He has very moderate positions of everything else. He says what he means. He wants to overhaul the whole party (in his ads he says “I want to take our country, and our party, back”) and Trippi has suggested that we’ll see similar Dean-like Congressional candidates popping up all over the country. When you listen to Dean and Trippi you don’t hear prepared overblown remarks; they just answer the question honestly, simply, and plainly.

I wish Aaron was old enough to vote next year, but he misses by about a month.

Draft in 2005

BushDraft.com was started to link all the news stories on Bush’s plans for a draft, and provide a place where people can find non-biased reports and articles about the draft. There will be a draft in 2005 if Bush is not stopped.

Wilton Manors mayor decides 1 term's plenty

Jim did a great job in Wilton Manors. I would have liked to see him continue in politics, and even run for governor or enter national politics.

From Sun-Sentinel:

Wilton Manors Mayor Jim Stork, who for the past two years has helped lead the city’s push toward redevelopment, announced he won’t be seeking a second term in next year’s election.

Read more

Writing discrimination into the law

Salon has a nice collection of right-wing reaction to the Massachusetts Supreme Court decision that a law banning gay marriage violates the state’s Constitution. (If you don’t have a subscription to Salon, you can watch an ad for a “Free Day Pass.”)

For conservatives, this isn’t really about gay marriage. It’s about attacking a group for political gain. Republicans think they can get away with constant stream of divisive and hateful rhetoric as long as their target is gays and lesbians.

They can’t. America is waking up to their strategy. Whether or not individuals support the idea of gay marriage, they overwhelmingly oppose GOP attempts to write discrimination into the law.

[Kicking Ass]

It's a Bush thing

I never liked Britney Spears. I think her voice sounds really horrible (I also dislike Madonna’s voice and any other singers that require a lot of studio effects to sound decent). She also seems like a dumb, uneducated redneck. I also find everything about her a complete turn-off.

However, it wasn’t until after she made a statement supporting Bush that I really started hating her. For the same reason, I became a fan of the Dixie Chicks after they spoke out against Bush.