"NYT Editorial about Antiwar Protests"

[Daypop Top 40]

A largely missing ingredient in the nascent debate about invading Iraq showed up on the streets of major cities over the weekend as crowds of peaceable protesters marched in a demand to be heard. They represented what appears to be a large segment of the American public that remains unconvinced that the Iraqi threat warrants the use of military force at this juncture.

Denouncing the war plan as an administration idée fixe that will undermine America’s standing in the world, stir unrest in the Mideast and damage the American economy, the protesters in Washington massed on Saturday for what police described as the largest antiwar rally at the Capitol since the Vietnam era. It was impressive for the obvious mainstream roots of the marchers — from young college students to grayheads with vivid protest memories of the 60’s. They gathered from near and far by the tens of thousands, galvanized by the possibility that President Bush will soon order American forces to attack Iraq even without the approval of the United Nations Security Council.

Mr. Bush and his war cabinet would be wise to see the demonstrators as a clear sign that noticeable numbers of Americans no longer feel obliged to salute the administration’s plans because of the shock of Sept. 11 and that many harbor serious doubts about his march toward war. The protesters are raising some nuanced questions in the name of patriotism about the premises, cost and aftermath of the war the president is contemplating. Millions of Americans who did not march share the concerns and have yet to hear Mr. Bush make a persuasive case that combat operations are the only way to respond to Saddam Hussein.

Other protests will be emphasizing civil disobedience in the name of Martin Luther King Jr. But any graphic moments to come of confrontation and arrest should be seen in the far broader context of the Capitol scene: peaceable throngs of mainstream Americans came forward demanding more of a dialogue from political leaders. Mr. Bush and his aides, to their credit, welcomed the demonstrations as a healthy manifestation of American democracy at work. We hope that spirit will endure in the weeks ahead if differences deepen and a noisier antiwar movement develops. These protests are the tip of a far broader sense of concern and lack of confidence in the path to war that seems to lie ahead.

The Blind Watchmaker ain't so blind after all.

The “Blind Watchmaker” ain’t so blind after all. An article in this week’s Journal of Theoretical Biology claims that simple chemistry makes the evolution of complex organisms with nervous systems inevitable. Is random Darwinism being replaced by a more sophisticated notion of “directed evolution”? Could this confirm the “intelligent design” theory of Creation? This may have profound consequences for our understanding of how life has come to be on this planet (and others). [metafilter.com]

Steven Frank writes about small developers…

Steven Frank writes about small developers who have to compete with Apple’s iApps.

Mike Pinkerton is thinking about quitting work on Chimera.

I don’t know what I can say to urge the Chimera folks onward. Competition is good. Safari is not and never will be entirely open source. Safari’s rendering won’t catch up to Gecko overnight, and it may never have support for some of the cutting-edge standards that Gecko supports. Nor will the interface necessarily work the way I want. I like and use Chimera, many hours a day, every day. Please keep going, and try to get others involved. Making Chimera more approachable for programmers would be a start—I’ve tried to make and suggest changes several times, and even submitted patches, which have been mostly ignored. [Nicholas Riley s Weblog]

This would be a huge loss. I still use Chimera and I have no plan to switch completely to Safari. I like Safari but there are too many things that just work better in Chimera. Safari also has a serious problem with not being able to log in properly to PHP-Nuke based sites.

Brain damaged installers

It should never be necessary for an installer under Mac OS X to quit all running applications when it installs another application. The Turbo-Tax installer does that for absolutely no reasons. I really hate installers that do things like that.